Do politicians “ put their money where their mouth is ? ” Ideology and portfolio choice . ∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
To investigate how political tastes influence portfolio decisions, we exploit the mandatory disclosure of equity holdings made by U.S. Congress members and a continuous measure of ideology based on their voting records. By doing so, we address methodological issues facing the literature on political tastes and investment decisions. We find that politicians with similar beliefs hold similar equity portfolios and that more liberal members engage in more socially responsible investing, even within each party. Our results are driven by both liberals having a relative taste for firms with high social responsibility scores and by conservatives having a relative taste for firms with low scores. Ideology-based investments do not carry over to less salient mutual fund selections. We attempt to rule out other explanations, such as constituent ideology, window dressing, and home bias. We conclude that politicians’ equity investment decisions are consistent with their political beliefs. JEL classification: G10, G11
منابع مشابه
Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy.
Insights from appraisal theories of emotion are used to integrate elements of theories on collective action. Three experiments with disadvantaged groups systematically manipulated procedural fairness (Study 1), emotional social support (Study 2), and instrumental social support (Study 3) to examine their effects on collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Resul...
متن کاملAn experimental study of the impact of competition for Other People’s Money: the portfolio manager market
In this paper we experimentally investigate the impact that competing for funds has on the risk-taking behavior of laboratory portfolio managers compensated through an option-like scheme according to which the manager receives (most of) the compensation only for returns in excess of pre-specified strike price. We find that such a competitive environment and contractual arrangement lead, both in...
متن کاملAn Experimental Study of the Impact of Competition for Other People’s Money: the Portfolio Manager Market
In this paper we experimentally investigate the impact that competing for funds has on the risk-taking behavior of laboratory portfolio managers operating under the typical contractual arrangements offered to hedge fund managers. We find that such a competitive environment and contractual arrangement lead, both in theory and in the lab, to inefficient risk taking behavior on the part of portfol...
متن کاملPersonalizing politics: a congruency model of political preference.
Modern politics become personalized as individual characteristics of voters and candidates assume greater importance in political discourse. Although personalities of candidates capture center stage and become the focus of voters' preferences, individual characteristics of voters, such as their traits and values, become decisive for political choice. The authors' findings reveal that people vot...
متن کاملIdeology Detection for Twitter Users via Link Analysis
The problem of ideology detection is to study the latent (political) placement for people, which is traditionally studied on politicians according to their voting behaviors. Recently, more and more studies begin to address the ideology detection problem for ordinary users based on their online behaviors that can be captured by social media, e.g., Twitter. As far as we are concerned, the vast ma...
متن کامل